Posts Tagged ‘Constitution’

Libertarians, Civil Rights, BP, and Rand Paul

May 24th, 2010

RESPONSE:

Rand Paul isn’t a racist.  His ideology, however, is the fertile ground that allows disability discrimination, gender bias, and racism to flourish.

Libertarianism, by definition, is about being selfish. Which is why it fits perfectly with racism, inequality, and Corporate greed.

The Constitution, by definition of it’s preamble, establishes “We the People” as a Community of the Commons.

The U.S. is about US, not just the desires of the most wealthy, or powerful.

FOLLOW-UP:

Private businesses get special benefits and protections that you and I don’t get.

When you register your business, you are essentially setting up a contract with the Government for these benefits and protections.

You can’t on the one hand want tax-deductions and limited liability, for example, but not accept the ability for Government to regulate commerce (explicitly given by the Constitution), prevent discrimination, or be willing for society to ensure business is not working against the public good (for example, that baby pacifiers don’t have lead in them).

Libertarianism is at the core of why BP failed, and continues to fail at preventing this oil disaster.

When the free-market is allowed to determine their own rules and regulations, this is what you get.  Depressions, Fraud, and Spills.

UNCOVERS:

America was founded as a nation of WE, not ME.

Ayn Rand, Rand Paul’s namesake and the fundamentalist failed ideology that followed, was a mistaken belief that all people and businesses are naturally good, operate to the benefit of society (the lift all boats philosophy) and the market will naturally fix itself if anything is out of whack, is dangerously ridiculous.

If you want a free-market, move to Somalia.

Share

Giving Miranda “Rights” to Terrorists- [Strong Dems Talking Points]

May 5th, 2010

RESPONSE:

The Constitution is the Drivers Manual for the Government of the United States.

It doesn’t GIVE rights or freedoms TO people, it RESTRICTS Government from taking AWAY the natural rights and creator-given freedoms you already have.

They are actually called the “Miranda Warnings.”

FOLLOW-UP:

All people have certain inalienable rights, and the Constitution and our laws exist to limit the Government from being tyrannical. The (Police, FBI, etc.) have to follow the rules, no matter how big a scum-bag the accused may be.

Your rights and freedoms end the second you cross the border.  It means that our Constitution was designed by the founders to make sure that all people were protected as far as how our Government operates.

We can’t control how other counties handle the natural freedoms and rights people already have, but we can restrict our own Government from taking those natural freedoms and rights away.

UNCOVERS:

Calling something a “war” should never be used to subvert the Constitution. We have a “war” on obesity, but we are not setting up a stake-out at McDonald’s to prevent Joe Citizen from getting a Big Mac.

Similarly, the “right to free speech” only applies to Government taking away that right. It doesn’t prevent your employer from firing you if you scream obscenities at your boss.

SIDE POINTS:

These are rules for Law Enforcement to follow defined by the “drivers manual”, not rights given to a suspect defined by the accuser.

  • The Constitution is a manual defining how far the power of Government can go.
  • Rights are not given to anyone.  Simply, it prevents the intrusion of Government from taking away your natural rights.
  • Strict Constitutionalists and Libertarians should respect this concept.
  • It also applies to Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Wickens, Atheists, Pastafarians, Anarchists, and all others.
  • Freedom is cool.

On the Miranda warning (Wiki):
The Miranda warning is a warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are interrogated.  A custodial situation is one in which the suspect’s freedom of movement is restrained (judged by the “free to leave” test), even if he is not under arrest.  An elicited incriminating statement by a suspect will NOT constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was informed of his/her “Miranda rights” and made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of those rights.

Share

Giving Rights to Terrorists- [StrongDems]

March 5th, 2010

Response (religion frame):

Only God can take away a person’s rights without a trial, not the Republican party.  Human rights come from Nature, not some political game for the cameras.


Response (law frame):

Does X think that, with a stroke of a pen in Washington, Government can take away anyone’s right to blink?  The Constitution was made to limit Government power, not the other way around, X.  I suggest you read it again.


Response (other):

This isn’t about Terrorists, and it isn’t about Rights, and X knows it.  It’s about Government power.  This is about making sure Government Bureaucrats can’t take yours freedoms away.


Follow-up:

Not only are you changing 212 years of American Constitutional Tradition, but you are immorally taking away the “rights of man” (use air quotes) by the stroke of a pen in Washington.  Do you really want us to be more like Tehran?  As we have learned, a Government bureaucrat on a witch hunt can do a lot of harm.  Is McCarthyism now the policy of the Republican party??

Side Points:

The Constitution limits the ability for our Government to take AWAY rights from all people.

Our founders (like Jefferson and Madison) created our Constitution to make sure that every dictator, king, or tyrannical despot know… ALL People (our Constitution never says ‘Citizens’) naturally have certain inalienable rights above Government, and shall not be infringed.

Share